Reactions have trailed Monday’s signing of the Student Loan Bill into law by President Bola Tinubu.
The signing of the bill was in “fulfilment of one of his campaign promises to liberalise funding of education,” a member of the Presidential Strategic Team, Mr. Dele Alake, told State House correspondents on Monday evening.
The Students Loan Act becomes Tinubu’s second piece of legislation signed since he assumed office two weeks ago.
The bill will enable indigent students to access loans at interest-free rates.
According to Alake, who was accompanied by other members of the media team, including Tunde Rahman and Abdulaziz Abdulaziz, and the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Education, David Adejoh, the new law mandates prospective beneficiaries to show proof of their origins.
The presidential aide said the move was in sync with standard practice in developed climes globally and would ease access to education.
“This is how it’s done in other developed climes. So this is a boost to our youths and students nationwide.
“Of course, there are prescribed qualification parameters. And that is the proof of indigenship of whoever is to be a beneficiary.
“Of course, there are committees to be set up. The members of committees will be drawn from various bodies to superintend over the efficient and proficient disbursement of this facility,” he added.
Although the bill takes effect immediately, the procedures for application will be worked out by the committees to superintend the process.
On his part, the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Education, Mr. David Adejoh, said by implication, the current scholarship board of the Federal Government will become a loan board capable of offering educational credit facilities to qualified applicants.
“Today, what the President has done goes beyond the symbolism. It is a demonstration of intent in terms of how he wants to handle education as he progresses in his presidency. Once the bill has been signed, that is the most important thing. A bill tells you what should be done. The how is what we are going to put together.
“What we have now is that nobody shall say money did not allow him to go to school”, he added.
The Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) described the law as discriminatory between the children of the rich and the poor.
ASUU’s National President, Prof. Emmanuel Osodeke told The PUNCH: “The union will react soon but everyone knows our position on student loans because you will end up encumbering the children of the poor with loans and debt after graduating. This is discriminatory. If what I read online is correct, it said it is only for children whose parents earn at least N500,000 per annum. That means if your father earns more, you won’t benefit”.
The National President of, the Academic Staff Union of Polytechnics, Mr. Anderson Ezeibe said: “I have not studied the bill and we don’t want to react on the surface. But I have seen one area that will not be practicable.
“It says that students should refund the money two years after NYSC. But what is the provision for someone who is not working after NYSC? And will they all get jobs immediately after NYSC?”
However, the National Association of Nigerian Students described the student loan bill as a “way forward” in the country’s education system.
In a statement on Monday, the Coordinator, NAN, Zone D, Adejuwon Emmanuel, however, faulted the repayment terms.
“Without saying much, student loan bill is a way forward to the educational system in Nigeria, because it will assist students whose parent cannot afford to pay tuition fee to be able to pay with the loan.
“But as good as this is, there are some questions that need to be answered by the government. The ultimatum for repayment is not feasible. As we all know that there is no work anywhere and most graduates don’t get work immediately, how will they pay back? How will it work when most of our graduates do not get jobs? Is there any plan or opportunity for those that have no work two years after NYSC?”
A former Deputy Vice-Chancellor at the University of Uyo, Prof Ini Uko, in an interview with our correspondent, lauded the initiative.
Uko said, “Well, this means that tuition fees will go up. The subsidy on tertiary education will be removed. Vice-chancellors will now be able to introduce tuition fees. This is a good initiative. I am a beneficiary of a student loan and, of course, the people who benefit from it will have to pay back.
“The truth is that we have to stop pretending that the government alone can continue to fund tertiary education. It is not possible”.
