Deputy Governor of Bayelsa State, Senator Lawrence Ewhrudjakpo has filed a suit against the state House of Assembly over an alleged plan to impeach him.
In the originating summons, Ewhrudjakpo alleged that the lawmakers were under pressure to remove him from office for refusing to resign from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) — the platform on which he and Governor Douye Diri were elected.
Diri recently resigned from the PDP, but Ewhrudjakpo has remained in the party.
Through his lawyer, Reuben Egwuaba, the deputy governor alleged before a Federal High Court in Abuja that some local council chairpersons, including Alice Tange of Sagbama Local Government Area, were also being threatened with removal for refusing to leave the PDP alongside the governor.
Ewhrudjakpo is seeking several interim orders, including one restraining the state House of Assembly from removing or impeaching him in violation of sections 188(5)-(9), (11) and 36(1) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), on the grounds of his refusal to defect from the PDP to the All Progressives Congress (APC) or any other political party before the end of his tenure.
He is also asking the court to restrain the assembly from initiating or conducting impeachment proceedings or meetings against him for the same reason and from recognising or dealing with any member of the APC as deputy governor of the state.
Additionally, Ewhrudjakpo wants an order restraining the inspector-General of Police (IGP), director-general of the Department of State Services (DSS), and the state Attorney-General from withdrawing his security protection as deputy governor pending the determination of the motion on notice.
After listening to Egwuaba move an ex parte motion on 27 October, Justice Emeka Nwite directed the defendants to appear before the court and show cause why the interim orders sought by the plaintiff should not be granted.
Listed as defendants are the state House of Assembly, its speaker, the IGP, the Director General of the DSS, the Attorney-General of the state, the state’s Chief Judge, and the Clerk of the Assembly.
In his ruling, Nwite said that granting the order for the defendants to appear would serve the interest of justice.
‘The interest of justice will be met by issuing an order for all the defendants to appear and show cause why an order of interim injunction should not be granted against them pending the hearing and determination of the motion on notice filed by the plaintiff’, the judge said.
The matter was adjourned to 13 November for the defendants to show cause, failing which the court will proceed to hear the motion on notice.
