Supreme Court dismisses suit seeking Tinubu’s removal over drug, CIA allegations
The Supreme Court has dismissed the lawsuit seeking the removal of President Bola Tinubu from office.
The suit, filed by the presidential candidate of the Hope Democratic Party in the 2019 general election, Mr. Ambrose Aworu, sought the President’s removal based on Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and drug allegations.
In an unanimous decision on Monday by a five-member panel of justices, led by Justice Uwani Abba-Aji, the apex court held that the suit was frivolous and that Owuru be fined the sum of N5 million.
It further warned the Registry of the Supreme Court not to accept any frivolous originating summons from the plaintiff again.
In the legal action he filed directly at the apex court, Owuru, among other claims, alleged that President Tinubu is an active agent of the CIA of the United States of America, a position he argued makes him unfit to occupy the presidential seat.
The plaintiff equally urged the apex court to disqualify Tinubu on the account that he had earlier forfeited the sum of $460,000 to the government of the United States of America in a drug-related case.
He specifically prayed the Supreme Court to invoke section 157 of the 1999 Constitution, as amended, and oust Tinubu from office for being under the control of foreign authorities.
Owuru, whose political party, HDP, had since been de-registered by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC in his suit marked SC/CV/667/2023, joined former President Muhammadu Buhari as a defendant in the matter.
However, when the matter was called up for hearing on Monday, the plaintiff, who wore his lawyer’s wig and gown, rose to argue his case by himself.
It was reported that the Abuja Division of the Court of Appeal had on 25 May 2023, also imposed a N40 million fine against the plaintiff for filing a “frivolous” suit to stop Tinubu from being sworn in as president.
Owuru had also attempted to stop Buhari’s swearing-in.
He claimed that INEC assisted President Buhari to manipulate the outcome of the 2019 presidential election.
He contended that though the election was originally fixed for 16 February 2019, the INEC, about five hours to the commencement of the poll, announced a postponement and later held the electoral exercise on 23 February 2019.
Owuru claimed that prior to the postponement, he had emerged as the winner of a referendum he said was conducted and monitored by both foreign and local organisations.
He told the court that he had, at the end of the said referendum, garnered over 50 million votes, which he said was far and above the number of votes that other candidates that contested the presidential election, including Buhari, secured.
According to the British-trained lawyer who was called to the Nigerian Bar in 1982, Buhari’s tenure was illegal.
Owuru alleged that though he was the valid winner of the 2019 presidential poll, Buhari hijacked his mandate and piloted affairs of the country for eight years.
Consequently, he argued that upon the disqualification of Tinubu for being unfit to hold the top job, the apex court should pronounce him as president and order his immediate inauguration to enable him to reclaim his usurped mandate.
Aside from President Tinubu and Buhari, other defendants in the suit are the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, as well as INEC.
