The ADC said that the development supports its earlier position that the dispute is not a legitimate legal matter but an attempt to manipulate the judicial process for political purposes.

‘What we are witnessing is not a legitimate legal dispute. It is a coordinated effort to weaponize the judicial process for political ends — a strategy the NBA has rightly described as an abuse of court process”, the party said.

The statement comes amid concerns raised by the NBA over increasing attempts to involve courts in intra-party disputes ahead of the 2027 general elections, despite provisions of the Electoral Act 2022 limiting such interventions.

In a statement on Friday, the NBA had warned that courts should not entertain suits relating to internal party affairs, citing Section 83 of the Electoral Act, which restricts judicial interference and bars interim or interlocutory injunctions in such matters.

Reacting, the ADC urged the Independent National Electoral Commission to remain neutral and avoid actions that could legitimise what it described as unlawful judicial interference.

‘INEC must remain a neutral arbiter, not a participant in political engineering’, ADC said, warning that any orders obtained in violation of the law ‘are fundamentally defective and cannot stand’.

The party also alleged that some actors were attempting to exploit the courts to create confusion around its leadership, despite clear legal provisions.

‘We commend the NBA for its courage in calling out these practices and for reaffirming that the rule of law must not be subordinated to political expediency’, added.

The ADC further warned that continued disregard for legal provisions could undermine democratic institutions and processes in the country.

‘Nigeria’s democracy cannot survive a system where laws are ignored, institutions are pressured, and judicial processes are manipulated to achieve predetermined political outcomes’, the statement further read.

ADC maintained that it would pursue lawful means to defend its leadership and protect what it described as the integrity of the democratic process.