Forensic analyst says Emefiele used forged documents to request $6.2m for election observers

The witness, Bamaiyi Meriga, called by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), informed the court that following forensic analysis of the disputed documents, he discovered that there was clear evidence of forgery of signature, and the seal of execution were different from the original.

The two documents – Presidential Directive on Foreign Observer Election and Presidential Directive on Foreign Observer Election – tendered in evidence were admitted in evidence by the trial judge, Justice Muazu.

Under cross-examination by Emefiele’s counsel, the witness said he was not a staff of the EFCC, and was not being paid by the anti-graft agency but his salary was domiciled with the Nigeria Immigration Service.

Counsel for Emefiele, Matthew Burkaa expressed displeasure over the conduct of the witness, saying that the witness misled the court by evading questions.

However, the prosecution counsel, Mr, Rotimi Oyedepo was not not happy with the defence counsel.

The trial has been adjourned till 11th March for continuation.

Emefiele is standing trial before Justice Muazu on 20-count amended charges bordering on corrupt advantages, conspiracy, criminal breach of trust, forgery and obtaining by false pretenses to the tune of $6,230,000.

He was accused of impersonating the SGF to illegally obtain a sum of $6.2 million.

In February, Mustapha testified before the court and said he knew nothing about the transaction up till the time he left office at the end of May 2023, adding that having served for five years and seven months, the document in contention didn’t emanate from the office of the then President Buhari.

Source: Channels Television